CQ Roll Call June 19, 2013 | Register

Romney Would Repeal Obama's Medicare Cuts

In a break from his running mate Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) budget proposal and contrary to what pundits had assumed, Mitt Romney announced that he “would repeal President Obama’s Medicare cuts rather than using the savings to shore up the program,” The Hill reports.

“The Affordable Care Act cuts $716 billion in Medicare payments to private insurance companies, doctors and hospitals. The cuts are designed to slow the rate of growth in Medicare spending, and they helped offset the cost of the healthcare law’s coverage expansion. Ryan’s budget would keep the $716 billion in Medicare cuts while repealing the rest of the Affordable Care Act… The campaign confirmed Wednesday that Romney, in a break with Ryan, would repeal the Medicare cuts outright, rather than leaving them intact and redirecting the savings.”

However, the Associated Press notes that restoring those cuts “could backfire if he’s elected. The reason: Obama’s cuts also extended the life of Medicare’s giant trust fund. By repealing them, Romney would move the program’s insolvency eight years closer, toward the end of what would be his first term in office.”

“Obama’s cuts were not directly aimed at Medicare’s 48 million beneficiaries; instead they affect hospitals, insurers, nursing homes, drug companies and other service providers. Simply undoing the cuts would restore higher payments to those service providers. And that would cause Medicare to spend money faster.”

  • Wynstone

    Romney’s promise to repeal the cuts is an obvious shellgame.  He would institute cuts of his own.  How could he not if he intends to balance the budget and not reduce defense spending?

    What is likely is that his attempts to balance the budget will be half-hearted because his only real agenda will be lowering taxes on the wealthy yet again.  With the further reductions in revenue, he and Ryan will make the argument that the GOP has been making for years.  We should end “entitlements” because we are “broke”.  It’s an agenda that Santorum revealed when he was still in the Senate.  He said they had to spend the surplus because it makes it easier to say no to spending on social programs.

    They don’t believe in the advantaged helping the disadvantaged.  It’s that simple.

  • DemInExile

    Another GOP pol arguing against cost cutting measures designed to increase the efficiency of government run programs? Who’d a thunk!

    And is it really a problem that Mitt would be driving the date of insolvency forward? Isn’t that his and the GOP’s goal? to starve the beast? A president Romney would continue to spend, but do so inefficiently (meaning direct excess public money to profits for private companies, thereby promoting the crony corporate capitalism he loves so much) to bring the financial rapture forward.  I’m sure nothing would give the GOP more pleasure than to bleed something they hate dry so that they could dump the carcass on the next president with a (D) and make him or her fix it. 

  • Pingback: How Does Cutting Medicare Make It Last Longer?

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...