CQ Roll Call May 23, 2013 | Register

The Growing Consensus on a Fiscal Cliff Solution

Greg Ip notes that the significant commentary around the “fiscal cliff” is overlooking what appears to be an emerging consensus among lawmakers on how to move forward.

“Presidents choose their words carefully. So when Barack Obama talked of  ’tax reform’ but not ‘tax rates’ in his acceptance speech early Wednesday, he was presumably sending a signal. And it was similarly significant that later that day John Boehner repeatedly stated his opposition to higher tax ‘rates’ rather than tax revenue. Within those two carefully crafted statements lies the nucleus of a deal: raising tax revenue through some means other than higher tax rates.”

“Thus far, Mr Obama has equated that with allowing the top two income tax brackets to return to their pre-2001 levels. But there is an alternative route to the same goal that does not require higher rates, and it comes courtesy of Mitt Romney. Recall that when asked how he would pay for a 20% cut to marginal rates, he proposed a cap on deductions… it’s quite possible that the two could start out small with more modest caps on deductions and cuts to discretionary spending with cosmetic trimming of health care entitlements – enough to justify extending the lower tax rates for a year and delaying the sequester of automatic spending cuts. It would be a down payment on a more ambitious plan next year.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/coreyb8421 Corey Berger

    Not going to happen. Too complex to get done in 6 weeks.

  • vti

    That may be bad news for the middle class. tax reductions for mortgage interest or health care help the middle class much more than they help the very rich. Unless rates for capital gains are raised, the rich will see little difference in what they pay in taxes, while the middle class could see big changes, if revenue is raised simply by removing the biggest deductions.

    • drzaius

      But if they capped the deductions and not removed them…

      • tom_b

        It’s a non-starter. Romney mentioned a 17 K cap on deductions. I’m a regular middle class guy with a modest mortgage and a couple of kids and I blow past 17 K in itemized deductions easily. I can only imagine how it’d be if I had a whomping mortgage.

        • ck

          Why should I have to subsidize your choice to breed and buy a house? I’m single and live in an apartment. I pay the full cost of my lifestyle, you should pay the cost of yours. Why should the taxpayer have to subsidize your house and kids?

  • AlaskanAnt

    Terrible idea! Give up leverage now only to have the House crazies hold a gun to their (yes, “their”, and “ours” too) head over renewing the debt ceiling? Never again!

  • TechGrrl1972

    Let the Bush tax cuts expire into the dustbin of history, and start fresh in January.
    As far as entitlement reform goes, has anyone considered that raising the retirement age simply adds to the unemployment rate, AND leaves more people without health insurance? Age discrimination is a problem now. If you are 56 and can’t find a job, or 60 and can’t find a job, how does RAISING the retirement age to 70 help you out?
    Jeebus….

  • TechGrrl1972

    Here’s my solution:
    1) Bush tax cuts expire, and good riddance.
    2) New tax law: just like Clinton years, except add new tax bracket: 50% on all income over 10 Million dollars. Oh, and close that carried interest loophole.

    3) Entitlement protection: blow lid off Social Security tax; tax ALL income, no matter how high. Ditto with Medicare tax.
    4) NEW ONE: add 1% tax on all dividend and interest income over $50,000. Dedicate this new tax to Medicare and Medicaid.
    5) Stop feeding the Pentagon pig. How is it that conservatives consider all government programs to be bloated and wasteful except the military? I offer the F-22 and F-35 programs as examples of bloat and waste. Kill them, and a bunch of the rest of the bloat.
    6) Here’s some entitlements to kill: subsidies to the oil companies.
    7) Alternative minimum tax: NO CORPORATION can pay zero taxes on profits. Minimum 10% tax, period. And no two sets of books, either. Whatever you report to the SEC and your shareholders is what you report to the IRS.

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...