CQ Roll Call May 24, 2013 | Register

There is No Infrastructure Crisis

President Obama highlighted the need to spend more on infrastructure to repair “the nearly 70,000 structurally deficient bridges across the country,” but Jack Shafer warns not to buy into the hype.

“As the Federal Highway Administration explains (pdf), when inspectors grade a bridge as ‘structurally deficient’ they’re not saying it’s unsafe, only that it is deteriorating and its load-carrying capacity is reduced.”

“Anything with a $2.7 trillion price tag should be approached with suspicion… Does every infrastructure ‘need’ demand a flotilla of dollars from Washington? Must we rescue every aging bridge in rapidly depopulating states like Michigan? Shouldn’t infrastructure projects such as harbor dredging be billed to those who directly benefit from them, and not the government?”

  • WA_workingman

    They will wish they spent the money when it costs exponentially more to make larger scale repairs within a decade or when one of those bridges whose “load carrying capacity” has diminished does collapse and they have a lawsuit and maybe some lives on their hands.

    • FreeStateLarry

      Shafer really twists the language from that FHA report, too.

  • 66kicks

    Considering that the cost of borrowing is near zero, now would seem like the best possible time to invest in rebuilding and improving our infrastructure. Repayment could come from “user fees” in the form of higher fuel taxes, or landing and docking fees.

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...